Tuesday, 31 October 2017

We Might NEVER know why "'The Giza Pyramid has "NO writing?! " BUT...may...

Hello Hello Hello! 

One of the greatest mysteries, is why does the Great Pyramid not contain any significant writing, in a bizarre act of humility out of keeping with so-called builder Khufu's tyrannical nature? In fact it is one of the greatest of all questions, because in order to build a structure such as the Great pyramid, there must have been universities and libraries and all sorts of learned people who were obsessed with the written word and mathematics. 

The traditional view, in the late 19th century, was that no pyramid contained any texts. A young archaeologist called Gaston Maspero challenged this when he uncovered pyramids at Saqqara dating from later dynasties than the enigmatic 4th, that is the 5th and 6th dynasties, which were covered with texts inside. The texts describe protections for the king in the afterlife and are dated to about 2400 BC. To be perfectly blunt, the pyramid texts are little understood by anybody. Robert Bauval holds that they may only be understood from the perspective of ancient astronomy, which is why they otherwise make so little sense. They are above all religious texts, discovered in fifth dynasty pyramids, and also found in the Egyptian book of the Dead. 

Again, to be blunt, the content of the pyramid texts are primitive, savage, and ridiculous, and one wonders why they were scrawled in the chambers of fifth-dynasty pyramids to begin with. But then one looks at the pyramids themselves and there is not much to talk about. They were built from mud brick, very cheaply, and have all imploded into nothing. Even when they were new, they were very little to talk of in comparison with the earlier pyramids. They were certainly not built by the builders of the Great Pyramid, but probably inspired by it.  

So why did a more advanced culture skip the writing, whereas a more primitive later culture, filled their pyramid with writing? It doesn't seem to make any sense! 

The fact that all pyramids are built in the Delta area suggest that only tribes from the North which entered Egypt, taking the delta, actually built them. The similarity in terms of layout of Giza with the Chinese pyramids seems to suggest that tribes from somewhere in central Asia swept into Egypt, explaining why the fourth dynasty culturally seems to have built very different pyramids to the third dynasty. The third dynasty also may have emerged from the Assyrian region, with some mythical progenitor possibly later recalled as Abraham.

But again, why would a literate people fail to place hieroglyphics in their own pyramids?  

Here we have confusion as our answer. We of course have the primitive khufu car touch or name graffiti discovered inside the so-called relieving chambers above the King's chamber, but these were never meant to be seen and in fact are quarry marks, or even forgeries based on quarry marks seen in nearby quarries, as speculated. Zacheriah Sitchin describes a scenario in which the infamous British archaeologist and adventurer Colonel Vyse, was caught forging the grafitti with red paint, so he could have a discovery but this information is contested. A series of discoveries in the last 20 years however, with robots crawling up shafts in the pyramid have revealed more of these red marks inside the Great Pyramid. It does seem to settle the question of who built most of the great pyramid. Nevertheless the idea of a stone-age civilisation having built the Great pyramid leaves one uncomfortable and unsatisfied. It must at least have been built by a people who knew their civilisation was collapsing, realising they were the last of a once far greater civilziation. They wished to incorporate information into the great pyramid, technical information, which was not necessarily information they had themselves come up with, but that their ancestors have come up with, however bizarre, and incorporate this information into the great pyramid, largely in the form of some number code, but with other clues also. By making the pyramid as huge as possible, they ensured the secret was lying in plain sight, just waiting for discovery. In fact Khufu's father Sneferu built at least three pyramids, similar to the great pyramid. Did he die three times and was he buried in three different locations? Of course not. The freakish tomb theory makes little sense, yet archaeologists still persist with it, perhaps a case of Occam's razor gone mad, even if this theory has never satisfied any person of broad understanding and curiosity. 

Arab legends state that the Great Pyramid was built in the last days of a dying civilization, and before the flood, by a King, sometimes called Suphis or Surid, later mixed up with the memory of Cheops of Khufu, who realised that the end of Egypt or Pre-Egypt was approaching. He ordered the pyramid to incorporate the sum total of all ancient science and technology. It was then sealed. Thus for generations, the pyramids were plundered by people hunting treasure, inspired by this legend. Newton seems to have been aware of this legend, messing about with pyramid ratios in an attempt to work out the gravitational constant. 

Maybe the builders just didn't want it to have any writing because then this would allow the splendid sculpture to become dated! They wanted to create something grand and magnificent for all the ages, forever! They were building something to last forever! Perhaps they did not want to create anything which would cause a future iconoclasm, to give people a reason to destroy, such a magnificent set of monuments! 

It meant that the planning of this was incredible. We should perhaps bear in mind that the pyramids were built for a variety of reasons, most of them unknown. Of course this means that hundreds of committees, with meta committees of the finest minds, even brought from other lands for this purpose, would have churned out enormous amounts of paperwork! In the destruction of Egypt in the first intermediate period, centuries later, all this paperwork would have been burned in an orgy of rage and blodlust. 

One of the reasons for the Great Pyramid's construction, and the overall Giza complex, may have been religion, for instance Robert Bauval with his stellar alignments theory postulates that state ceremonies of ressurection took place inside the great pyramid.
Secular examiners of the 20th century, such as Kurt Mendelshon held that the great pyramid was an arbitrary structure chosen for construction in order to unify the nation. right the beginning of Egyptian history, behind a massive singular project. This would increase the power of the Egyptian state behind the king. This was actually also an argument of several of the ancient Greeks and Romans. One still however has to ask where the knowledge came from and in this way the argument seems to fall to pieces.  

Getting back to the argument for religion, most hieroglyphs are actually designed to have a visual impact, as well as a literary one. They are not necessarily just letters and syllables but a system known as logographic. Placing a picture next to a word, for instance, indicates the context of that word. Hieroglyphics were used for holy structures, like temples, with the shorthand version, hieratic used since old kingdom times for record keeping and business. By lacking any writing at all, the Egyptians or whomever, indicated that this was not a structure of business, or religion, or anything which they wished to define in any way but a mathematical and geometrical one. Then again, Herodotus in 450 BC wrote that the pyramids were covered in hieroglyphs which told the record of their construction, and that a ramp, which was more impressive than the pyramids, was also covered in hieroglyphs. No-one has ever reported this and there seems no evidence for it. Was he simply a babbling madman? 

Another reason for the construction of the Great Pyramid, was to possibly incorporate ancient scientific libraries into the very design and architecture of the great pyramid. 
In this way the science of the ancients would be transported to the future as a time capsule. Most knowledgeable people saw the way things were going and legend has it that astronomers had predicted an impending great catastrophe. Looking at pyramid ratios to make Biblical-style forecasting was invented in the 19th century but this is confused by even Wikipedia with everybody who seeks out ancient ratios in the design of the great pyramid. If so the builders of the great pyramid themselves could be accused of being pyramidologists for incorporating scientific information into the pyramid. 

Pyramidology in a way was invented by the pyramid builders themselves! There is so much information here, possibly even underappreciated information such as atomic information, certainly measurements of the earth, as well as other planets and the solar system. It is as if the Egyptians used the pyramids as a time capsule, to replace the nearby great library at Heliopolis. Herodotus in 450 BC, held the priests of Heliopolis to be the most learned of all the Egyptians, with the most reliable histories. This was all shifted to Alexandria in later times. By Roman times authors describe a city almost totally abandoned, despite the fabulous architecture and obelisks everywhere. Only a few priests remained to guard over what was left, the eternal ancient city of Egypt. Some authors such a Pliny put two and two together and realised that the famous obelisks of Heliopolis, which have generally all been shifted to cities like Rome and Paris, could represent solar rays coming down from heaven. The fascination of Heliopolis with the Sun could mean that the pyramid also encode information about the Sun, as well as so many other things.

Since there always was a huge library at Heliopolis, and there must have been, engineering books, and so many other books, on mathematics, and other topics, I think we can remove the idea that the builders did not have writing. In fact recent discoveries even point to the presence of hieratic-like texts, or shorthand Hieroglyphcis from Khufu's time, even writing supposedly describing the construction of the pyramids, although I have a feeling it was more like a major renovation of a pre-existing structure. Particularly since the Inveotry stela, found on a Giza temple dating from 670 BC, descries Khufu has having found and renovated a pre-existing temple. Perhaps he merely added the casing stones, and carried out some internal renovations, itself worthy of a tremendous achievement, also possibly re carving the sphinx into the image of a face which seems to match his chin, possibly a member of his family. 

Perhaps it was decided that the pyramids were simply replacing the Sun City's library and decided to encode as much information as possible into them. By skipping the writing, they possibly figured that they would produce a question in the minds of future people... what information is contained in the building itself? 

Guys thanks very much.. 

Thursday, 26 October 2017

Reacting to (and trying to explain) MOST FREAKISHLY "WACKO" OLMEC STUFF!?

The Olmecs, located in Mexico, constitute one of the earliest known civilizations in the Americas. Part of their mystery is about trying to understand their bizarre artistic rules and motif. 

The Olmecs certainly have a very large Chinese component to their culture, even a picture of a dragon with no wings, typical of Asia. Like the Chinese, they worked with Jade. But there is a lot more going on as well... The name Ku-Fu is actually pure Chinese. The Chinese pyramids are so much like the Egyptian pyramids and in addition, Both Olmecs and Egyptians worshipped Cats and Snakes, which both seem to express similar facial DNA as well as behaviours. There is something very feline about the way snakes move, and vice versa! 

What it really boils down to, is the concept of diffusion, as well as the fact that Olmec reliefs are incorporating snake, as well as 'jaguar' elements, to make them holy. This is the origin of the weirdness factor! Or at least one of them. 

The Olmec heads, might seem to actually be pre-End of Ice Age. I say this because they are very distinct and different from all the Jaguar-style Art which looks more Chinese. 

Wednesday, 25 October 2017

OOPS.. "FAT GARDEN BUDH" is "NOT Actually" G. Buddha (400BC), but "Prome...

What your Garden Budh did sixty thousand years ago, may shock you! 

Have you ever wondered about the history and story behind the Garden Budh? Guatama Buddha was a historical figure who lived four centuries before Christ. He rebelled against regimentation and desparing at the transience of life, spent his life in prayer and fasting. His promulgation of a set of earlier doctrines triggered their spread throughout Asia. Since everything alive was said to have been re-incarnated from something earlier, he was said to have been the re-incarnation of an ealrier set of buddhas, going back in time to an indefinite era that no-one can identify. 

Your garden budh represents Guatama Buddha also since all buddhas are linked but before Guatama was born he was someone else. 

It is hard to reconcile a fasting austere man with the laughing fat man who seems to be forever at happy peace. 

The first clues as to the fat mans' origin are his ears. They are often depicted as stretched, elongated. In fact Buddha is a long ear, like the ruling class of easter island until they were wiped out in the 1600s, during a crop failure in the little ice age, by their unruly subjects, the short years. 

By tracing the laughing fat man to his ultimate origins we discover a history so incredible that it bloows the mind. 

There is always a legend of some god of knowledge. He came down and taught people writing and everything. Often this god was seen as the bad guy. WHY?! Why is the god of knowledge the bad guy? 

Here is a scenario that I believe in.  

Eighty thousand years ago were the final days of a great and glorious civilization hundreds of thousands of years old. great straight roads had been built across continents, now existing possibly as rumours of tunnels underground, often mistaken or used as mines, whose cities were later cannibalised into descendent cities, retainining alignemtns with other cities despite no present roads linking them. 

seventuy thosuand years ago the great lost supercivilzation, with a technology far exceeding ours was already in decline. At the time the Toba volcano erupted, possibly in conjunction with other massive disasters. geneticisits tell us there was an enormous bottle neck in the populations of most world species at this time, implying that there were very few survivals and all reproduced subsequently from a tiny number. Solon too, was told that humans reproduced from a very tiny number, who survived allt he catastrophies. 

Be this as it may. the eruption, or any catastrophe, would have affected one side of the earth disproportionately, compared to the other side fo the planet. For example 12,000 eyars ago, carp;oma nau impacts. also in norway and russia, seem to have wiped out all prior memory in the northern hemisphere. 

what was left was that one hemisphere retained some vestiges of high technologhy, with the other side of the planet reduced to the stone age. What followed was a period of survival and consolidation and warfare. One side of the planet battled away with laser canons while the other used sticks and stones.  

By the time the dust settled, generations had passed. Victors emerged with their flying craft trying to recolonize the other portions of the world, which had fallen into the middle ages, spreading their steampunk-level or more advanced empires. Legends grew up of wars fought in heaven. The underdogs in teh war sought to swell their ranks by raising the medieval civilzaitions out of hte abyss, with new technologies and other ideas, hence hte memory of teacher gods. 

We are now post toba, in an entirely uncertain period, but one described by the Mahabharata war. 

Any catastrophe, unless it is a nuclear exchange, must by its nature affect one side of the planet more disproportionately than the other, economicalyl and physically. It seems that victors from the high-tech side of the planet, attempted to re-settle the low-tech side of the planet. They wished to acheive their dream of uniting the world with one language, as it had been in times of old. 

Based u[on the spread of populations, the oxford dictionary of world mytholgoy actually tells us that the joker god, mankind's olderst god, seems to date from 60,000 eyars ago! This correlates very well with the advent of the toba eruption! 

This IS the ancient giant, the fallen Angel. What's going on here? 

Look at the Zburch idol for another picture of Budh, a wide-heade dgiant. In the middle is middle earth, our plane, the plane of mankind. Above are the giants of asgard, including a ring lord, similar to Hephastus, builder of technology. Below we see a giant actually holding up middle earth, he lurks in hell. What is he doing down there and who is he? He almost looks like an easter island statue. He is quite simply another giant or one of the nephilim, but underground. He is the fallen angel, cast down out of heaven in an epic war, tens of thousands of years ago, and remembered in this way. 

I beleive this was a sort of device, to venerate, but to also teach children the three levels of earth, as well as germanic mythology. Imprisoned below, a snake dripped acid on the fallen angel. This was captured in a bucket by his wife but he writhed in pain when she had to go empty the bucket. The parents could have used this as a teaching device and would have pointed out that as acid dripped on Loki, this would cause earthquakes. Meanwhile the archaeologists say the whole thing is just another idol. 

But what is it all about? They seem to have been remembering a scientific event, from eons earlier, high technology. 

This could be Budh, or could be Loki. In fact Budh, or Loki, is presented as about half the height of the gods in the heaven. In the Bible we know there are Giants and then Nephilim which are half gods. These were the bad batch, who broke the laws of heaven, in mating with the regular humans, and are threfore presented as half the size, and on earth, or even under the earth, being punlichsed. 

Here we see something of a confusion between the legends. 

Who is this ancient creator and why would the legends say that the first god already had the alphabet and technology? How do we explain this? 

Depicing the Budh as fat is therefore another way of representing, essentially, an ancient giant. You either increase the height, or the bredth. 

In.... due to a fearsome palace coup, 10,000 Chinese sailed out into the Pacific. They knew not where they were going, except that it would be safer thwna where they were. Those who made it to Mexico combinend with the natives to found a new civilization, the Olmecs, and the Chavin de Huantor, taking much chinese culture with them, the pyramids, number system, which was later handed to the maya, 

Are these olmec heads more representations of the giant Budh? How about the statues of easter island? Perhaps more of the same? An exhortation of sympathetic magic, demanding the reappearnce of the creator god. 

They carried with them, possibly for good luck, a representation of the memory of the ancient giant, who at one time helped mankind! 

Budh, Odin, one and the same, but their roles are confused. In fact the stories of each god seem to intermingle somewhat. At the end of the day, the names, which vary from tribe to tribe do not matter as much as the stories behind them, which are primordial and relate to a time beyond imagination. They were passed on from generation to generation, even after the original context was lost, becuase they were thought to be too important to be lost forever. They are the abbreviated versions of much longer tales, some of which are found in the Indian Mahabharata, an extraordinary text, unbelievable as it is a survival of times from before 50,000 yars ago. 

This idol from Bali was in a friend's house. I asked them what they thought it was. They said Buddha. I pointed out that he is a sleeping and content. He is sort of like a sleeping giant, and even sits beneath a kind of pyramid. There is a recurring legend that King Arthur as well as Barbarossa are asleep underground waiting for their people's direst need to awaken. Is this when the ancietn god was thought to have returned bearing superior technology, lend-lease technologies to subject peoples? 

What occured is that half the world was possibly obliterated in the eruption, with the survivors on the other half taking generations to rebuild their technology and regoup. Then they would land on the medieval side of the earth, over here, 

The Egyptians held the artifier, Hephaustus, god of technology, to be their first god, implying gods landed in Egypt, or elsewhere, from another part of the planet, or ultimately elsewhere, an outer space colony, . 

Later, nuclear war or even another catastrophe devastated the advanced side of hte planet, an inferno, leaving only reliques of technology and godlike kings on the primitive side of the planet, to rebuild. Hence the legends of gods coming down from heaven. They were really coming to colonize, to expand their own empires, and mating with women, having left their own women at home, was the fastest way to accomplish this, especially if they became marooned. We therefore lack many ancient technological texts as texts from the primitive side survive as well. 

In examining the Zburch idol we can see that they present the ancient gods, the giants, as heavenly, and the half gods, the nephilim, as cast to earth and underground. They could not perhaps conceive that the giants, not being originally synonymous with gods, and very human, should have too roamed the earth. I call the giant era the time of 120k-60k BC, the time after that, until the great catastrophe of 12,000 BC, i call the Nephilim Era. Humans lived in places such as Egypt. The stones of Baalbek and the Giza buried temples may have been hewn in this time, the era before the great catastrophe of 12,000 BC. The worldwide nephilim empire used geopolymer and advanced cutting technologies. Over time as they were separated, technologies varied, but they continuied to share with each other. Eventually hte distinction between nephilim and regular human was lost. Worldwide trade broke down and people forgot their international connections after periods of long dark ages and further cataclysm. 

Is this what happened? How innocent, are you, Garden Budh? 


Old School Website http://charles.kos.id.au/


Videos collected together http://www.whatisgiza.com/

My publishing website: http://plusultrabooks.com.au/

My 2nd Youtube Channel, will tackle the BIG QUESTIONS, INTUITION, SELF HELP, and the UNIVERSE! https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZBlwLbe40Ohjc9FH12LkLA

Monday, 23 October 2017


There is no going back after this! This is the "FINAL PROOF" that Bible contains information from the lost super-civilisation. Quite simply look at Adam's Ribs. The story goes that Adam's rib was removed by the Lord Our God in order to create Eve, who was then given back to Adam. 

This implies that 1) Cloning took place and it was done by ancient humans. How else would the story have come down to us. 2) That Adam and Eve may have been placed in a garden situation as a type of genetic experiment, a 'perfect world'. This was some ancient best-seller which morphed into the Book of Genesis! 

We know that stem cells are taken from bone marrow, but that is obviously not all that is going on here! Oh no no no! This is simply the tip of the Iceberg. We know the caduceus is the symbol for DNA which is also the symbol for medicine. It must have been so for tens of thousands of years! 

But here is the thing... We have 24 RIBS but they are PAIRED UP. Why come up with such an analogy? It's quite obvious really! The PAIRS of ribs are a metaphor for chromosomes! UNBELIEVABLE! Take one away and you have 23, the number of chromosomes in man. 

It gets better. Man has ONE LESS chromosome than women, or at least one is SMALLER! This is unbelievable! It places DNA and CHROMOSOMES in the CONTEXT of cloning from Adam's STEM CELLS. 

What becomes clear is this whole thing was an ancient textbook, which has become summarised into ONE SINGULAR LINE in the Bible! UNBELIEVABLE! Simply because the ancients could not understand this. I believe the culprits to the priests of Heliopolis who realised they were the LAST OF THE LAST of this great civilisation. As a result they decided to not only build the pyramids to enshrine ancient mathematics, but enshrined it in GENESIS, which then became heavily summarised. I believe GENESIS may have been the ORIGINAL holy book but as the Bible expanded due to prophet after prophet after prophet... well they had to shorten Genesis, For an example of how long original Genesis must have been... look at the 18 volume Mahabharata which takes up a library Shelf!

Saturday, 21 October 2017

Cover up? "UNBELIEVABLE RUINS" spotted in CRATER 10 min from STONEHENGE!...

WHY are we not being told!!!!? According to the info there is a copse of trees which guards a crater which leads down into the Earth and there are many weird stone ruins below. The area is also supposedly haunted by some force which does not approve of humans tampering with the area.

This story was told by a friend (who I won't name) from a reliable pair of witnesses who travelled in England in the 90s, I believe. There are UNBELIEVABLE ruins in the Stonehenge area. If you have info about the story, or anything, please leave a comment!

According to the story, the area is not photogenic. All pictures taken at the site did NOT come out. Furthermore no locals knew about this. The question is... did the couple actually even travel into another time? This is all exceptionally weird!

The thing is... there is HEAPS of weird ruins around Stonehenge! The apex of the Stonehenge 'triangle' which is really a hexagon, is Old Sarum. All the monuments on this hexagon, as I speculated in an earlier video, are possibly the ruins of bastions of an outer wall of Atlantis, which prior to this held the magnets for a giant synchrotron, in a far more technical civilisation.

Another thing is that Stonehenge actually honors its own latitude as the latitude is built in. That means it's honouring it's own location, implying it's built in honour of another earlier structure. It's crazy!

Friday, 13 October 2017

ABU RAWASH pyramid didn't "explode", but "IS" PRE DILUVIAN?!

This is interesting 1) There is a Grand Gallery in this pyramid which no-one talks about. 2) There is a boat pit lined with horribly primitive stones. In fact the boat pit at the Khufu pyramid is not even lined with stones at all... which tells us... KHUFU ET AL DID NOT BUILD THE PYRAMIDS! This is the first time I've seen clear evidence that the pyramids are older than the Old Kingdom! Now I am thinking that they date from the Demigod or Nephilim period!

In addition there is a clear layer of mud or something which has turned into rock but was once mud, on top of the boat pit. We cannot see if the Egyptians cut through this layer or the layer came after, as there has been too much looting in this place!

Thursday, 12 October 2017

The Tiwanaku "Viracocha God" found in Australia.... because of this!

Tiwanaku, VIRACOCHA GOD, found in Australia?

What's going on? The Tiwanaku god may appear with hands outstretched upwards.... or even downwards, in which case he would actually resemble Baiame, the Australian Creator God who has the same role as Viracocha! Inconceivable! The way to explain this is that the Viracocha travelled across the Pacific and actually reached Australia, and thrived here! 

We also compare this god with the Raimondi Stela where we see that he has a big bad brother, who looks a bit mean! 

Tuesday, 10 October 2017

Old GIZA Drawings Reveal "ENORMOUS" Nearby ruins now LOST to ARCHAEOLOGY!

Ancient Ruins of Heliopolis seen near Giza?!

This is unbelievable. It would seem the remnants of Heliopolis are seen in this old French picture of the Giza complex. Probably destroyed in the 19th century. In particular it would seem there is a temple complex which by its appearance could be New Kingdom. Then again it could just as easily be Old Kingdom, we do not really know. 

One must ask why, did the Arabs in 641, decide to build a new city for themselves, right next to the pyramids? Why did they not use Alexandria, or some other Egypto-Roman city which was already established? They must have had a plenitude of building materials at their disposal. This is all now underneath Cairo. 

Archaeologists say that Heliopolis is now 15-20 meters underneath the northern part of Cairo! They also say that Memphis, 20km to the south of Giza, which was the capital of Egypt for thousands of years, only had 6000-30,000 people in the Old Kingdom! I cannot accept this figure because it would mean that the pyramids were not even built during the Old Kingdom... too few people for such an undertaking! 

Sunday, 8 October 2017

Why Khafre's Pyramid is smaller, may leave you with no words!

Why Khafre's Pyramid is SLIGHTLY Smaller may leave you with no words! 

There is a huge CLUE as to what is going on at Giza regarding the fact the Khafre pyramid is a tiny bit smaller than the Khufu pyramid.

One the one hand, the Great Pyramid, with all its earth measures (geomancy), might actually refer to the Earth itself, in terms of the arrangement with the other pyramids. In this case the Khafre pyramid could refer to Venus, our sister planet, which is slightly smaller, but there seems to be a better explanation... Atomic Theory! 

Let's look at this! In this scenario, it would seem that the Khufu pyramid might represent a neutron, being white, neutral, 'Earth'. It is a fact that a proton is slightly smaller, having been converted from a proton by the ejection of an electron, represented by the Menkaura pyramid. This would represent a lone inner pair. 

The outer reactive orbital of any atom is the one which forms bonds. In this case, we have six small outer pyramids. Using the periodic table, we could argue that the entire Giza complex therefore represents the Oxygen molecule! This is amazing! NOW we ask... why worship Oxygen? The answer? 

Monday, 2 October 2017

King Arthur's Suspicion about the Great Pyramid may shock you!

Did the Grail Quest involve the Great Pyramid? 

Excalibur was not a sword but some kind of technological device and was probably seized from the great pyramid or something similar. 

We're not just gonna suggest it, we're gonna prove it! 

Firstly Excalibur is clearly not a sword but a kind of electrical cannon. In battle after battle, Arthur single handedly slays hundreds of people. There is only one thing on earth which can do this: high technology. Excalibur was a super-weapon of some sort. Swords to not of their own accord win battles and kill multiple people. No sword can do that. Of course monks and others writing the ancient legends down could translate the weapon in no other way that people would understand, but as a sword. King Arthur is in part a science fiction story describing technology from deeply ancient times. Historical Arthurs may simply be imitators. 

The story is also only partly british. The mainstay of the arthurian legend derives from khazakstan in central asia, where the local legends sound like arhturian lore. Celts sweeping across Asia carried the tales to the British isles where they were kept safe. On the contiennt, new conquests elimintaed the peoples who brought the stories. Khazakstan is also the location of the Apple component of the Adam and Eve story, as apples derive from there. 

Excalibur was given to Arthur by a lady in the middle of a lake. Of courrse we know there are not goddess ladies in the middle of lakes so what do the legends talk about? 

Herodotus clarified much of this for us in his histories when he described the pyramids of lake moeris in the middle of a lake. The Giza pyramids also appeared to be in the middle of the lake. The giza pyramids in roman times were the location of the worship of the goddess, deriving from the triple goddess. This later became christianised into the virgin in later times. We also see the inscription "Hermaois Terismegistus" on the sphinx stela. Let me explain. When Thutmosis the IV went to sleep in front of the sphinx, he had a dream that it was speaking to him, asking to be uncovered. On his dream stela he refers to the beast as: 

"Horemakhet-Khepri-Ra-Atum. This is four gods strung together. The Greek version of the First, HoremAkhet could be Hermes, and then three gods added. In other words... Hermes... Tris Megistus, a single god, who actually has a triple form. The sphinx is Hermes Trismegistus. 

Trismegistus means Triple Majestic, or the Thrice Great and is one of the oldest of mankind's gods in the greek world. The trinity is after all a stone-age phenomenon. At Giza we see not only three pyramids but nine, which are therefore a a 3 by 3 representation. These are tombs not of men, which are found nearby but gods, and possibly also a storage for technologies and artefacts of these ancient gods and god kings who once ruled Egypt, according to Egyptian lore, before 5000 BC. This is all something I cover in my book. 

The Virgin is the ultimate goddess. The Trinity too was a fundumental part of the religion of the old times, with god until the middle ages and even more recently depicted in churches as an eye inside a pyramid. This legend was the inpspiration for Tolkien's Eye of Mordor. In this sense the eye lives in the mountain, just as King arthur lies sleeping but will one day awaken when his people need him, just like other kings such as Charlemagne and Alric and Barbarossa. 

An ancient device of tremendous destructive power which may have been seized from the great pyramid is the ark of the covenant. The dimensions of the kings sarcophagus match the ark, showing it may have likely been an effigy of the ark, and certainly not a box for a coffin. After all the Biblical religion in part originated around the area of the great pyramid. The Israelites developed the worship of a war god who would free them from bondage. The existence of the ark was the proof that this god existed. 

Due to some curse or ruin which befell britain, It was important for King Arthur to send his knights to a deep foreign land where they had to penetrate the grail caslte to view the holy of holies hwich was supposedly the holy grail which shone with a bright light. Grail castles are depicted in old paintings as shining white fortresses on a hill far away. They supposedly had no windows or entrances and were difficult to get into. Their appearnace is very much how a person would describe a huge pyramid, if one had only a general description. If it relates to the Giza pyramids, the story was written when they still had their outer white cladding of limestone. 

One thing we actually know about Khazakstan is they built pyramids not unlike the pyramids at Giza... we are only on the cusp of discoveries in this area! They built pyramids in imitation of giza, or even before Giza. The arhturian legends is goodness-knows how many of tens of thousands of years old! 

So important was the grail quest to return or to recieve a precious artefact or ancient technology which he somehow thoughut would save his kingdom, that Arthur had no hesitation in sending out all of his bravest knights, in other words, his entire army, leaving only a skelleton force to protect his kingdom from teh ravages of Mordred's army to the north. Arthur was relying on the return of some superweapon which would complement excalibur, which would help his kingdom survive. The tales of superweapons as found in ancient India, may have been more prolific. I feel these texts were in libraries the world over. Arthur's primordial world, hwenver it was, was no longer in this era of high technology characterised by the lost supercivilization. It was long after the Toba eruption! He therefore needed to open some ancient vault in order to recover a piece of lost technologies. Such a pieace of technology was literally a kingmaker. I imagine that when man finally loses the ability to make bullets, firearms will continue to be handed from chiefdom to chiefdom out of pure ceremony. 

I have always felt the grail quest was not a quest for an object but a quest to return an object or relic, to remove a curse. But at the end of the day we do not really know. Later commentators and authors in the dark ages had little clue how to translate the ancient technological terms so instead we have confusing effusive plots where the original story has been confused and lost. 

Arthur's knights were skillful commanders, the best and most worthy. Arthur didn't just want skillful leaders. He didn't want a coup on his hands. The knights needed to be decent people as well. They had each already distinguished themselves by tremendous initiative, formitable cunning and battle skill, and the highest in morals, with morality as their very religion. They were the best of the best, and they would surely recover the artefact for Arthur. On the grail quest they faced numerous challenges and they lost thier way, most of them never returning to arthur, for they had sworn the quest would be accomplished or they would die trying. they seem to have been absolutely true to their word, prefering death to the dishonour of returning empty handed, never seeing thier homes again because the quest was almost an impossible one. As legend has it, only one knight, Sir Percival, was able to penetrate the grail castle. He was only able to view some strange electrical apparatus, the light of God, only given the chance to view it, and perhaps only in a dream, which is described in a bizarre way, as if he had recived some electrical shock. The quest had failed. Was this the memory of an excavation of the great pyramid? 

Arthur's kingdom, wherever it was originally located on the planet, was lost. Lacking his generals, who were busy possibly conquering Egypt, in order to open or demolish the pyramids in search of an ancient artefact, Arthur faced his enemies almost alone, falling in battle. His final wish was to return Excalibur to the lady in the middle of the lake.