Monday, 26 December 2016
Okay! There are two lost pyramids somewhere on an island on Lake Moeris, according to Herodotus, who issued the following description of the site:
“[I]n about the middle of the lake stand two pyramids that top the water, each one by fifty fathoms, and each is built as much again underwater; and on top of each there is a huge stone figure of a man sitting on a throne. So these pyramids are one hundred fathoms high, and these one hundred fathoms are the equivalent of a six-hundred-foot furlong, the fathom measuring six feet, or four cubits (the cubit being six spans). The water that is in the lake is not fed with natural springs, for the country here is terribly waterless, but it enters the lake from the Nile by a channel; and for six months it flows into the lake, and then, another six, it flows again into the Nile. During the six months that it flows out, it brings into the royal treasury each day a silver talent for the fish from it; and when the water flows in, it brings twenty minas a day.”
In this video, a new location for the site is suggested, in line with what we know of the equinox worship of the pyramid builders!
Thursday, 22 December 2016
Ok! From the relevant article (fair use)
Egypt has announced the discovery of the remains of a lost city thought to be more than 7,000 years old, located in the Upper Egypt province of Sohag.
The ancient residential city, found alongside a nearby cemetery, dates back to 5,316 BC, and is being heralded as a major archaeological discovery that pre-dates ancient Egypt's Early Dynastic Period that began about 5 millennia ago.
Monday, 19 December 2016
Australia WAS mapped long long long ago! It could have been the Chinese it could have been the Arabs or even Indians, Japanese, unknown civilizations. One thing which can be proven right away is it was circumnavigated as early as 300 years ago, before Captain Cook charted the East Coast. It was discovered and the northern part mapped as early as the time of Al Masudi in the tenth century.
Guys what if I told you that Australia was mapped AGES ago. I'm not talking Portugese, i'm not talking Chinese, i'm not talking Dutch, i'm not talking Spanish or anybody. I'm talking BEFORE all this. At least 900 AD we had a map of the north coast. This is PROVEN in this video. YES! #AL_MASUDI_MAPPED_AUSTRALIA. don't just believe it, it's right here in black and white for all to view!
Secondly, this information could well go back to about 8000 BC when sea levels were actually rather high! Who can say!
300 years ago a Danish Explorer called #Frederick_Norton pointed out something quite remarkable regarding the #Giza_Plateau. He talked about a fourth black pyramid on the plateau. He was RIGHT! I kinda identify it here and describe exactly why it was 'black'! The blackness, JUST LIKE THE CANALS ON MARS! Seem to be SEASONAL, something which I find absolutely REMARKABLE. This actually looks like a pyramid, unlike the other two #Menkaura_pyramids which is why I suppose Norton ignored it all in his description. Oh well!
Sunday, 18 December 2016
Excavation of Baalbek. I do a voiceover to show this is manmade concrete! No-one would be insane enough to simply carve a huge block like this and move it. They were laid in situ. I suggest the quarry is actually where a huge temple was going to be built. I even show the archaeological layer of destruction.
Ok, I have a few things to talk about regarding this. For starters, these people were called sodomites, it seems due to their shiva-linga worship, which is rather interesting. (I don't believe anyone else has ever suggested such a thing!) In addition, we look at some very old ruins which are clearly pre-Deluvian. I think one ice age would be the YOUNGER DRYAS, which would be 13,000 years ago in which the world suddenly shrank (the 'container contracted', Sea Levels Rose) and one in about 3200 BC, which ended history back then. I think these ruins date back to the earlier cataclysm.
Saturday, 17 December 2016
There is a huge structure underneath the Giza pyramid which is not discussed... anywhere... at all. Carbon dating only dated the OUTER LAYER of the Khufu pyramids which is just plain wrong. However the interiors of earlier pyramids WERE Dated in 1995 and earlier in 1984... guess what? They date to centuries to even almost a millennia earlier than these structures are supposed to have been built. Datings were only taken from a handful of locations. The dating of the Khufu pyramid was utterly exhaustive but... only on the outer layer... Why?!
Friday, 16 December 2016
There is a SECOND Sphinx at Giza. That's right! This theory is actually rather old, dating to the time of the dream Stela of Tuthmosis. The thing is the tomb of Kentkawes appears to have the same erosion pattern as on the actual sphinx and even is in a corresponding location on the giza plateau this time in front of the menkaura pyramid instead of in front of the Khafre pyramid like the actual Sphinx.
Tuesday, 13 December 2016
All this is older than sphinx
In this video we look at the possibility that the Sphinx is older... way older than currently believed!
Monday, 12 December 2016
Check my video on the mass extinction of 250 million years ago! What if this was caused by a lost super civilization! What if Australia was logged for feedstuff for smelters, and Australia was obliterated at that time for its iron ore wealth.
Sunday, 11 December 2016
Friday, 9 December 2016
New Information to add to 'Sudden Earth Implosion Theory': on 'The Flood'----Suddenly Implosion and gradual re-expansion.
The oldest structures on Earth, all happen to be 'cyclopean'. That is they are enormous blocks, fitting tightly together, and hence presumably moulded with some kind of geopolymer, or now, I see, another technique called re-bar (thanks to the vids of a youtube channel called WISE UP), but what is the reason for this? One reason of course may be to have made structures resistant to an enormous form of earthquake, possibly the biggest earthquake mankind had ever experienced, with memories of enormous disaster, fresher in the minds of ancient peoples, than people today. Is this why Gobekli Tepe was built upon an enormous hill? What are some other possible reasons behind this?
'The flood' was the big crisis in earth's mythology, and NOT ICE. Ice does not feature in mythology relating to the creation of our world, to my knowledge, as a destructive factor. Why would it? Gradual glacial movements are too gentle and can easily be avoided. Sure there may have been an Ice Age. There is plenty of evidence in Europe for it! The problem, however is that it may not have been the destructive force it was cracked up to be.
In the Bible and other creation tales we deal with a flood spreading across the earth, lingering and then gradually receding. What can the mechanism have been for this? Nothing in nature moves uniquely in one direction. I have postulated that, for example, the Earth Implosion, had it occurred 13,000 or so years ago, may well have collapsed the crust by several percentage points, yet what about rebound? The rebound is the force which may have re-expanded the earth, somewhat, letting it settle out, and draining the water across the wider landmass. The re-ignition of certain nuclear processes in the Earth might account for this.
It seems between 65 MA and 2 MA, earth was relatively stable, then a certain instability crept in and ice began expanding and retreating many many times until the present time, when it is still in a kind of retreat it would seem. This in turn lowered and raised the levels of the oceans, perhaps even independently of the shock younger dryas event. At any rate there is a lot of evidence for asteroid/cometary theories, but I do like this theory also.
Thursday, 8 December 2016
There could well have been a LOST CIVILIZATION in Victoria, Australia! Check it out, guys! I think they may have built the lost stone circle in Derinnallum, Victoria!
Monday, 5 December 2016
GIZA TRINITY THEORY
It occurred to me to write a simple article on this theory to explain, simply what it is all about, and why it is far superior to the current tomb theory of the pyramids.
BackgroundI came up with this theory to explain, simply, the triplicity seen at Giza. Three large pyramids, and then three smaller pyramids under two of the large pyramids. These are supposedly Queens' pyramids. I reconciled this with the NORSE mythology which states that the Triple Goddess, or Great Lady lives under world mountain which is what I presume the pyramids to be representations of. This would be representative of a once wider religious idea. In fact the Triple Goddess is almost the universal world-wide stone-age goddess.
Refusing to believe these were tombs (the burial practice differs to the MASTABA cemetery underneath the pyramids, these must be the actual royal burials), it appears they were built for a similar religious practice to the mounds of Europe and America and Asia. They had to be as big as possible in order to make an artificial mountain, and home of a pantheon of gods, essentially a huge 'tomb' but so big that it's for gods not man.
Current TheoryI was taught in archaeology class that when the Egyptian king died, he moved from a Horus, or sky god, into an Osiris, or Green Man fertility God. In fact we already have a 'green man' at the KHUFU pyramid who was worshipped before Osiris came into wider fashion: KHNUM. The name KHNUM KHUFU is scrawled inside the pyramid itself. KHNUM is essentially the creator of man, having sculpted him from clay. This essentially suggests Khufu became a 'Khnum' upon death, instead of an Osiris.
Giza Trinity theory is actually similar to current theory: except that it might reserve the burial chamber for KHUNM HIMSELF, explaining why no-one was ever buried inside a pyramid! The three Queens' pyramids next to the Khufu pyramid would have been reserved for the Triple Goddess who lived under world mountain. She survives in more recent tradition as a "Three Marys", who look over baby Jesus in the manger. This whole scene could well be primordial, dating from before Egyptian times.
The Trinity survives in various ways in the Christian religion. It is also clearly seen at Giza. As well as being seen at the Birth of Jesus, they are also seen in paintings RE the Death of Jesus.
In fact they are the goddess of birth and youth, the goddess of middle age, the goddess of old age and death, all together. Their extreme antiquity is evidenced at the story of the Judgement of Paris.
The TrinityThis was the stone-age pantheon which later found its way into the Catholic religion.
In fact a fertility goddess, ISIS was worshipped at GIZA well into Roman times. As late as the 19th century, fragments were broken off the Dream Stela, discovered under the sphinx, by local peasants, in order to increase, by ritual, their own fertility.
The confusionIt took a long time to finish each pyramid. In fact, each would be about the lifetime's work for each of the king's involved, leading to the belief in later times they were trying to build tombs for themselves. What they may actually have been trying to build were temples for the Triple Goddess.
Connection to OrionAlthough my book: In Search of the Origin of Pyramids and the Lost Gods of Giza, does not mention this in depth, this theory is a natural successor to that of the great book of the 90s: "The Orion Mystery". Orion was of course Osiris, and the three stars the belt, but also naturally in the 'reproductive' position, of the otherwise androgynous figure: the center of the Orion constellation. The triple pyramid therefore in a way copies this. What I say is that this is in relation to the Trinity.
CONCLUSIONIn a nutshell the above is the theory. It took a great deal of time to build the Three Pyramids of Giza. Three kings seem to be been involved. These were built for fertility reasons. Not as tombs. The DISCOVERY: Giza is a Temple to the Stone Age Triple Goddess, NOT tombs for three kings.
Friday, 2 December 2016
EARTH IMPLOSION AT END OF PLEISTOCENE?
What if the Earth's diameter was able to implode... by say, 5%. DOES THIS EXPLAIN EVERYTHING about the last MASS extinction, which happened during the Ice Age?
I am very excited today. Everything came together in a snap while reading a strange book. I had the ultimate EUREKA-MOMENT.
'OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!' I said. 'THE EARTH HAS SUDDENLY, CHANGED SIZE!' It seemed to explain everything! It explains the Holocene MASS EXTINCTION. Firstly the Earth is really like a star... heated according to similar nuclear or unknown principles. All stars are variable and change size all the time. Earth is simply a star which was not hot enough to blast away the garbage heap of the outer crust, which is always disintegrating and reforming. The next thing I'm going to say might shock you...
The Ice Ages NEVER made sense
I have never actually received a suitable explanation for why mammoths in Siberia suddenly froze solid with tropical plants in their mouth, supposedly at the end of the Pleistocene (ICE AGE) and why those mammoths are still frozen solid today, with the supposedly tremendous global warming. Tell me... does that make any sense? In fact the Ice Age does not seem to have touched Siberia: the coldest place on Earth. There do not seem to be erratic boulders found there!
All this happened 14-10K years ago and it was one of the biggest mass extinctions in history, usually ascribed to collapse in temperatures (The Younger Dryas) as well as the rise of man. But the overall period was one of an increase in temperature, or so it might seem.
Now to today. I more or less co-discovered this with my brother while having a Eureka moment reading Herbie Brennan's 'The Atlantis Enigma', 1999. The picture Herbie presents is of everything occurring together, the recent uplift of the mountains, the nature of erratic boulders as strewn 'somehow' and certainly not according to temperature (erratic boulders which supposedly prove the Ice Age found in the Sahara as well as Australia: but oddly not Siberia. [And how about crazy Snowball Earth, where erratics found on the Equator supposedly prove Ice Emerged from there, say 400 million years ago?] Then we have Mammoth bones crushed together, at times into a kind of cement. They are crushed in places, with human bones, implying everything went at once. These compacted deposits of animal carnage are located from Gibralta to Malta to Australia and beyond. There is more! Parts of the Atlantic floor don't even have any ocean sediment at all! They were above ground not too long ago! Something huge happened, and it happened not so long ago.
Whatever it is that occurred seems to have allowed mankind to finally conquer the world, perhaps also blanketing Earth in dust, killing off large predators, so that mankind could rise and multiply.
Doggerland, an island which is now Dogger Band, sank. Sundaland flooded, turning into Indonesia. (Robert Schoch proposes the sea level rising spread the pyramid builders from here, all around the planet). The Amazon Rainforest suddenly appeared perhaps less than 10k years ago, or as recently as 5k years ago. For much of its human history it was actually a farming plain, strangely enough.
As for the Ice Ages, sure there might have been some ice, more than today, but I think there is a problem with the theory of erratic boulders proving it, which could have been scarred or moved by any violent force.
Earth Expansion theory
One of the things which made me 'click' was the notion that Earth has changed size several times in the past owing to Earth Expansion. My old geology prof. Ian Plimer mentioned in a you-tube interview that the future of Earth Science might be a cross of Expanding Earth and Plate Techtonics, rather than simply Plates calmly sliding over a FIXED SIZE EARTH, as if it were a block of marble, never changing its state! The earth is liquid inside, or seems to be, liquids and gasses, like a star. Why should this be of fixed size? Why should it change? Almost every star in the universe is variable, either over years, minutes, seconds, or millions of years. They all change in intensity and size. Why not earth, which also has a dynamic nuclear dynamo at its center?
This theory can explain the entire Holocene extinction. We no longer need a massive supernova to explode far away. I found it hard to see how such an explosion could rain its plasma (comets) on the earth, as the inverse square law would totally diffuse the blast: would any fragments actually touch Earth at all? (A scenario illustrated in Cycle of Cosmic Catastrophes)
My brother then asked me if the number of days in the year had changed, implying the Earth had increased in rotational speed, conserving the same momentum but being physically smaller. "It had" I answered. It has gone from 360 to 365! This would imply a contraction rather than an expansion, which would have lowered the sea levels. The sea levels ROSE at the end of the Pleistocene. (Ice Age). Contraction!
The difference between 360 days and 365 days would be related to the sudden diameter change in the surface of the Earth. I think it would all have happened suddenly, hence the choice of words being: EARTH IMPLOSION THEORY, by men, to describe this strange concept.
Memories of Something Violent
There are vast accounts now trapped in creation myths of various shaman traditions of catastrophic events in the past. Here is an event which the Egyptians tie to the shrinking of the number of days.
An Egyptian Poem:
A long time ago, Re, who was god of the sun, ruled the earth. During this time, he heard of a prophecy that Nut, the sky goddess, would give birth to a son who would depose him. Therefore Re cast a spell to the effect that Nut could not give birth on any day of the year, which was then itself composed of precisely 360 days. To help Nut to counter this spell, the wisdom god Thoth devised a plan.
Thoth went to the Moon god Khonsu and asked that he play a game known as Senet, requesting that they play for the very light of the moon itself. Feeling confident and that he would win, Khonsu agreed. However, in the course of playing he lost the game several times in succession, such that Thoth ended up winning from the moon a substantial measure of its light, equal to about five days.
With this in hand, Thoth then took this extra time, and gave it to Nut. In doing so this had the effect of increasing the earth’s number of days per year, allowing Nut to give birth to a succession of children; one upon each of the extra 5 days that were added to the original 360. And as for the moon, losing its light had quite an effect upon it, for it became weaker and smaller in the sky. Being forced to hide itself periodically to recuperate; it could only show itself fully for a short period of time before having to disappear to regain its strength.
From this we get that the moon was blanketed in a kind of dust, being dimmer. This could have been kicked up by the sudden contraction. The Egyptians also link this to the lengthening of the year. Of course, memory of the number of days changing would imply someone was there recording this, an established civilization.
Here is what could have happened
The mammoths were grazing and happy. Humans emerged from their proto-towns and settlements to go into the wilds and hunt and farm with permaculture, gathering wild seeds they had planted a season before.
For an unknown reason a phase change occurred inside the Earth itself! Earthquakes had been increasing for some time already. Then, one day, oceans erupted. The earth shook. The nuclear reactions in the Earth had altered, precipitously.
Oceans suddenly rose and the earth's crust settled into a new state, with mountains suddenly uplifted, in the Himalayas and Alps and elsewhere. The waters of the earth flooded the lands of a comparatively smaller planet.
The earth then settled into a higher-pressure scenario with now, the increasing building up of both temperature and earthquake pressure. Erratic boulders were flung around the planet in the sudden upheaval. Welcome... to the Holocene.
This is: EARTH IMPLOSION THEORY! A new idea, founded today!
Please leave comments below!
I am an author and several other things, check out my book: In Search of the Origin of Pyramids, on Amazon!