Monday 2 October 2017

King Arthur's Suspicion about the Great Pyramid may shock you!




Did the Grail Quest involve the Great Pyramid? 

Excalibur was not a sword but some kind of technological device and was probably seized from the great pyramid or something similar. 

We're not just gonna suggest it, we're gonna prove it! 

Firstly Excalibur is clearly not a sword but a kind of electrical cannon. In battle after battle, Arthur single handedly slays hundreds of people. There is only one thing on earth which can do this: high technology. Excalibur was a super-weapon of some sort. Swords to not of their own accord win battles and kill multiple people. No sword can do that. Of course monks and others writing the ancient legends down could translate the weapon in no other way that people would understand, but as a sword. King Arthur is in part a science fiction story describing technology from deeply ancient times. Historical Arthurs may simply be imitators. 

The story is also only partly british. The mainstay of the arthurian legend derives from khazakstan in central asia, where the local legends sound like arhturian lore. Celts sweeping across Asia carried the tales to the British isles where they were kept safe. On the contiennt, new conquests elimintaed the peoples who brought the stories. Khazakstan is also the location of the Apple component of the Adam and Eve story, as apples derive from there. 

Excalibur was given to Arthur by a lady in the middle of a lake. Of courrse we know there are not goddess ladies in the middle of lakes so what do the legends talk about? 

Herodotus clarified much of this for us in his histories when he described the pyramids of lake moeris in the middle of a lake. The Giza pyramids also appeared to be in the middle of the lake. The giza pyramids in roman times were the location of the worship of the goddess, deriving from the triple goddess. This later became christianised into the virgin in later times. We also see the inscription "Hermaois Terismegistus" on the sphinx stela. Let me explain. When Thutmosis the IV went to sleep in front of the sphinx, he had a dream that it was speaking to him, asking to be uncovered. On his dream stela he refers to the beast as: 

"Horemakhet-Khepri-Ra-Atum. This is four gods strung together. The Greek version of the First, HoremAkhet could be Hermes, and then three gods added. In other words... Hermes... Tris Megistus, a single god, who actually has a triple form. The sphinx is Hermes Trismegistus. 

Trismegistus means Triple Majestic, or the Thrice Great and is one of the oldest of mankind's gods in the greek world. The trinity is after all a stone-age phenomenon. At Giza we see not only three pyramids but nine, which are therefore a a 3 by 3 representation. These are tombs not of men, which are found nearby but gods, and possibly also a storage for technologies and artefacts of these ancient gods and god kings who once ruled Egypt, according to Egyptian lore, before 5000 BC. This is all something I cover in my book. 

The Virgin is the ultimate goddess. The Trinity too was a fundumental part of the religion of the old times, with god until the middle ages and even more recently depicted in churches as an eye inside a pyramid. This legend was the inpspiration for Tolkien's Eye of Mordor. In this sense the eye lives in the mountain, just as King arthur lies sleeping but will one day awaken when his people need him, just like other kings such as Charlemagne and Alric and Barbarossa. 

An ancient device of tremendous destructive power which may have been seized from the great pyramid is the ark of the covenant. The dimensions of the kings sarcophagus match the ark, showing it may have likely been an effigy of the ark, and certainly not a box for a coffin. After all the Biblical religion in part originated around the area of the great pyramid. The Israelites developed the worship of a war god who would free them from bondage. The existence of the ark was the proof that this god existed. 


Due to some curse or ruin which befell britain, It was important for King Arthur to send his knights to a deep foreign land where they had to penetrate the grail caslte to view the holy of holies hwich was supposedly the holy grail which shone with a bright light. Grail castles are depicted in old paintings as shining white fortresses on a hill far away. They supposedly had no windows or entrances and were difficult to get into. Their appearnace is very much how a person would describe a huge pyramid, if one had only a general description. If it relates to the Giza pyramids, the story was written when they still had their outer white cladding of limestone. 

One thing we actually know about Khazakstan is they built pyramids not unlike the pyramids at Giza... we are only on the cusp of discoveries in this area! They built pyramids in imitation of giza, or even before Giza. The arhturian legends is goodness-knows how many of tens of thousands of years old! 

So important was the grail quest to return or to recieve a precious artefact or ancient technology which he somehow thoughut would save his kingdom, that Arthur had no hesitation in sending out all of his bravest knights, in other words, his entire army, leaving only a skelleton force to protect his kingdom from teh ravages of Mordred's army to the north. Arthur was relying on the return of some superweapon which would complement excalibur, which would help his kingdom survive. The tales of superweapons as found in ancient India, may have been more prolific. I feel these texts were in libraries the world over. Arthur's primordial world, hwenver it was, was no longer in this era of high technology characterised by the lost supercivilization. It was long after the Toba eruption! He therefore needed to open some ancient vault in order to recover a piece of lost technologies. Such a pieace of technology was literally a kingmaker. I imagine that when man finally loses the ability to make bullets, firearms will continue to be handed from chiefdom to chiefdom out of pure ceremony. 

I have always felt the grail quest was not a quest for an object but a quest to return an object or relic, to remove a curse. But at the end of the day we do not really know. Later commentators and authors in the dark ages had little clue how to translate the ancient technological terms so instead we have confusing effusive plots where the original story has been confused and lost. 

Arthur's knights were skillful commanders, the best and most worthy. Arthur didn't just want skillful leaders. He didn't want a coup on his hands. The knights needed to be decent people as well. They had each already distinguished themselves by tremendous initiative, formitable cunning and battle skill, and the highest in morals, with morality as their very religion. They were the best of the best, and they would surely recover the artefact for Arthur. On the grail quest they faced numerous challenges and they lost thier way, most of them never returning to arthur, for they had sworn the quest would be accomplished or they would die trying. they seem to have been absolutely true to their word, prefering death to the dishonour of returning empty handed, never seeing thier homes again because the quest was almost an impossible one. As legend has it, only one knight, Sir Percival, was able to penetrate the grail castle. He was only able to view some strange electrical apparatus, the light of God, only given the chance to view it, and perhaps only in a dream, which is described in a bizarre way, as if he had recived some electrical shock. The quest had failed. Was this the memory of an excavation of the great pyramid? 

Arthur's kingdom, wherever it was originally located on the planet, was lost. Lacking his generals, who were busy possibly conquering Egypt, in order to open or demolish the pyramids in search of an ancient artefact, Arthur faced his enemies almost alone, falling in battle. His final wish was to return Excalibur to the lady in the middle of the lake. 

No comments:

Post a Comment