A really simply explanation of the theory which EXPLAINS what GIZA IS FOR!

What the pyramids really are for! 

The pyramids are not granaries per se, but this may have been the explanation given to tourists, by locals. For nearly a thousand years, tourists coming back to Europe stated that the pyramids could be the granaries of Joseph. But why? Why foster this ridiculous lie? Locals even told Herodotus, truly that the pyramids did not have internal chambers, save for the Khufu pyramid. What were they getting at?

The answer is obvious

 All legends have some grain of truth which got the ball rolling. This is perhaps no exception. In fact, it is quite clear what is meant if we examine the similar behavior of locals at the Sphinx in the nineteenth century, following the discovery of the Dream Stela. This was a rock found carved at the base of the Sphinx. The New-Kingdom pharaoh who cleared the sand and restored the Sphinx, decided to put the Stela there. It was then reburied for millennia, since the Sphinx basically resides inside a hole in the ground.

Locals actually came and chipped away parts of the stone before it was rescued, for fertility reasons, as a token. We also have evidence that the name of the Sphinx was essentially remembered in Greek times as Hermes Trismegistus or a kind of wise Triple God. We also have evidence that Isis the fertility goddess was worshiped at Giza, since her temple was placed next to the Khufu pyramid in Greco-Roman times. The Great Triple Goddess was of course a neolithic fertility and world cycle entity. These are all memories of one goddess. The triple aspect of course also explains the triplicity seen at Giza. Without mentioning the Triple Goddes, Egyptologists explain the pyramids in terms of later gods, stating that the King, when dead, becomes Osiris, fertility god, continually regenerating the fertility of the land.

The pyramid seems to be a fertility temple. 

Pyramids are worldwide

There is another thing we really should consider. This is that we have huge mounds in Europe which were remembered as mounds for the conduction of fertility and harvest festivals.

Can we really apply Osiris to all the other world pyramids? Hardly. We need to go much further backwards in time (space) and look for a common denominator. These would be the so-called triple neolithic fertility gods and goddess of the Neolithic or New Stone Age, as well as Copper Age. We are talking pre-4000 BC here. I note that history begins in about 3100 BC in various parts of the world, settled by pyramid builders, so perhaps pyramid builders settled in about this time, after some catastrophe, and this was their 'year zero.'  We need to look before 3100 BC to find out who the gods were... We have three main gods in Eurasia at this time, a huntress (which became Artemis, essentially the Great Triple Goddess, and whose companion was a dog (sphinx)), a fertility deity, as well as a stick god, a sort of Totem. 
 

The Triple Goddess

Across Eurasia, the major Goddess seems to have been the Triple Goddess. Early man noticed a recurring 'triple' aspect in nature, each obviously directed by one aspect of the triple goddess. This is preserved in the Catholic religion, based party upon earlier European religions, as the 'Trinity', or triple aspect of God.

The triplicity seen at Giza is evidence of worship of something related to the triple Goddess. Other pyramid complexes around the world, such as Teotihuacan, also have certain triple aspects although not all do.

If we extrapolate back the fertility rituals which took place at Giza throughout historical times, and include the fact of resurrection or Osiris worship, and then include the fact that we need to look at worldwide deities to explain the prevalence of pyramids at an early time, we find that this derives back to a look at the Great Triple Goddess, explaining the triplicity and sphinx (dog) seen at Giza.

In Germanic mythology, which has been preserved in Scandinavia and represents a sort of early Cro-Magnon concept, the triple goddess lives under world mountain.

Conclusion

The Giza pyramids are a sort of mountain home for the triple goddess, the complex being dedicated to fertility and resurrection and eternal cycle of the land. The religion died soon after the Giza pyramids were completed.

Back to HOMEPAGE

If you would like to read more about some of my ideas regarding all this, please have a look at my book, In Search of the Origin of Pyramids and the Lost Gods of Giza, available cheaply in Kindle edition. It is also available in paperback edition for those who wish to make notes. I guarantee you will see info found no-where else. . . 

Does Synchronism prove Hologram Theory? 

There is a lot of talk lately that we are some form of projection. 

I did not believe the Hologram Theory at first but it sure as hell explains a lot. Increasingly clear this could be the case, at least as far as it might enable understanding of coincidence. The physicists have got it all wrong. There is not just entropy (disorder) which is increasing. (In the 19th century the physicists realized that everything is driven thermodynamically, so that heat (disorder) can be generated, driving all things forwards.) In fact, some bizarre coincidences today scream that something else is at play. 

Everything in the universe is stacked information. What is coincidence anyway except for a projection of related 'information' in the same place at the same time. That's when people say 'wow small world'. That information is one 'pixel' as the projectionists would say, being broadcast from somewhere in the universe. The fact the coincidences do not match up exactly indicate the pixel itself of information is being damaged by the distance it has to travel. 

This is where it gets funny. It's like an information 'entropy', in terms of an engine for moving things forward. Things bound within the same space-time system (us for example?) are continuously being USED to generate or playback information, fostered on them by something else. What is this something else? It indicates we are playing out our lives as Shakespeare would say, on a kind of stage, only in control insofar as we can 'stuff things up' as an actor might. So we are just pixels? Is that what it all is?

This leads to questions. One is really interesting (for me I suppose)

• Are we, a highly infinitely complex organism kept alive due to projection capacity or our own capacity. 

Finding the location of the Great Projector

This is where it gets interesting! Hold on tight, because:

We could also triangulate the distance of the hidden 'projector' by somehow measuring the time difference and relatedness of coincidences on other star systems, assuming we became interstellar. If we were to stand in front of the projector, coincidences would actually be 'repetitions' rather than a kind of whimsical deja vu with an air of 'possibility'.

In addition, the 'repetitions' might occur at exactly the same time, so in a world located in front of the GREAT PROJECTOR coincidence and so me other magical stuff would be eliminated! Would there be less quantum mechanics, therefore, going on in worlds in front of the great projector?

Please leave feedback! Much appreciated! 


If you would like to read more about some of my ideas regarding all this, please have a look at my book, In Search of the Origin of Pyramids and the Lost Gods of Giza, available cheaply in Kindle edition. It is also available in paperback edition for those who wish to make notes. I guarantee you will see info found no-where else. . . 

Giza Pyramids Explained!

In Scandinavian mythology the three pyramids are the home of the triple goddess, who live under world mountain, possibly represented by the three Queens pyramids next to the Khufu pyramid, or the three unfinished pyramids next to the Menkaura pyramid also. This is to make sure that Egyptian fertility will never fail. It is also possibly designed to enhance fertility in Egypt, not simply of crops but everything, perhaps humans as well. The Giza plateau was used for this purpose by locals until the 20th century. Please check out the below videos for more information on this.

Giza Pyramids Explained! This might be my 'trailer' for now. 

Why Three Queens' Pyramids at Giza?

What is going on?

The three Giza pyramids are essentially either a representation or a physical home or resting place for the triple goddess. They are also represented in the Bible as the Babel religion, that is, a religion which has spread throughout the world, composed of people building towers as close to heaven as possible (pyramids?) I noticed this in Ireland when I noticed cairns placed on the very tops of mountains. The highest possible part of the mountain was chosen for cairns, around 4000 BC, and they have stood there ever since! Ireland represents an earlier manifestation of the pyramid religion than Giza, neolithic cairn-building and Sin(moon crescent)-worshiping farmers having traveled there in ancient times, before the construction of the Giza pyramids, which are a more civic and formal later manifestation of this religion. 

The religion itself is the continuation of the neolithic triple-goddess religion. What we see at Giza is possibly three homes for the triple god, and in addition three homes at the base of two of the 'mountains', Menkaura and Khafra pyramids, for the triple goddess. 

Who is the Triple Goddess? 

The Triple Goddess in later times evolved into many forms, the black Madonna, and also this lady, Diana or Artemis, with her hounds. 

Diana, also associated with the moon, original Semitic god. Her bow is the moon. She has three aspects. 

In fact, it would seem that the Spinx and Giza was once possibly a dog, as per the theories of Robert Temple. In addition there is some speculation that there was more than one sphinx on site! The Three Queens' pyramids of the Khufu pyramid are on the same side of the complex as the Sphinx. The triple Goddess would have her home, as well as her hound(s).

Here we have possibly the triple goddess' home under the Menkaura pyramid. The Khufu pyramid have three more well-built structures. They are attributed to various queens, but details are sketchy. If we follow Scandinavian mythology, which may preserve very early elements of Eurasian mythology, these might represent the triple goddess who lives under world mountain.

If you would like to read more about some of my ideas regarding all this, please have a look at my book, In Search of the Origin of Pyramids and the Lost Gods of Giza, available cheaply in Kindle edition. It is also available in paperback edition for those who wish to make notes. I guarantee you will see info found no-where else. . . 

The Giza pool-table mystery! These are not tombs! But I'll show you what they really are!

I have made a pool-table model and cardboard pyramids at my home in order to explain the Giza mystery!

For decades, people have categorically stated that the Giza pyramids look like they belong at the end of Egyptian history, rather than at the beginning, as they occur.

Giza Pyramids, Actually a Temple for the Triple Goddess?

What's really amazing is that no-one has really linked the Triple Goddess with the

Off center but who cares, it's what's in it that matters!

The Giza pyramids are the final relic of worship of the Eurasian Triple Goddess. 

Charles.

If you would like to read more about some of my ideas regarding all this, please have a look at my book, In Search of the Origin of Pyramids and the Lost Gods of Giza, available cheaply in Kindle edition. It is also available in paperback edition for those who wish to make notes. I guarantee you will see info found no-where else. . . 

Pyramids are not what we know of as the 'Egyptian' religion, but an older one

Pyramid invaders into Egypt.

The evidence is clear. The presence of worldwide pyramids, (Babel builders were 'scattered' around the world) particularly in the light of continuous redating of pyramids all over America to earlier and earlier times, shows us that one cannot explain the evolution of pyramids in solely Egyptian terms This is truly an unexplained worldwide phenomenon. This acknowledgement has consequences for Egyptian prehistory..

Pyramid builders invaded Egypt from two directions.

One of the things I suggest in my book is that evolution of pyramids did not occur solely in Egypt, an idea which dovetails into the Egyptological desire to specialize only on Egypt. Rather, pyramids are found everywhere, going well back, I argue, to the days of the temple discovered in Turkey in the 90s, which dates from several millennia after the Ice Age ended, Gobekli Tepe. That temple, being on top of a hill, like Giza, has pyramid-like attributes, particularly as it was an established structure, subsequently covered over. The religion of covering over old sites with soil is found as far as Britain, Ireland and the Americas. In Ireland roundhouse palaces became mounds. Communal longhouses belonging to the tribe were covered over and subsequently became long barrows in Britain and continental Europe. In Poland these survive as 'pyramids' in primordial polish forests, untouched by the plow Polish Pyramids.   ..

Given the profusion of worldwide 'pyramid' culture and idea, the fact an ancient temple to the ancestors becomes a huge mound (and whether or not such mounds derive from the mountain-worship religion of primordial times), we can expect that Egypt would in fact, lying on a land bridge, between Africa and Asia, have been invaded by various pyramid cultures at several times, which are far older than Egypt. This is the 'explanation' that many have been seeking for why it is that pyramids occur at the very beginning of Egyptian history. Although the heyday of pyramids was the third millennium BC, they go back well before that, into prehistory. We know this due to archaeology, but also more or less by the fact that no-one from even historic times (post 3100 BC) knows or recorded what pyramids are for It's been old hat for a very long time indeed

Was this hill in Turkey an early 'pyramid'?. . . 

In fact, in the book, I argue that Egypt was invaded by two different pyramid cultures. Some invasions are cyclic and periodic. For instance look at the Viking invasions of the British Isles. Vikings became Northmen, became Normans, Saxons, and then 'English'. English then invaded Ireland and in many cases became Irish nationalists. Irish people then basically traveled everywhere. The process was ongoing for thousands of years. 

I believe that pyramids they evolved in Egypt due in part to internal developments but also due to (something Egyptologists generally allow for, but won't discuss for a variety of reasons) invasion. The invasion need not have been bloody. There is no evidence that it was. Look at migrations ongoing today into Europe. 

The origin of Third and Fourth dynasties

In the book, I suggest that the Third Dynasty was a culture which comes from an unknown eastern direction. This was possibly not Mesopotamia, because this culture, in Egypt, lacks many Mesopotamian details, despite having very similar pyramids which look like Ziggurats. 

The culture was then usurped by invaders, I am guessing from the west, who instituted the fourth dynasty. These I hazard, are from the plains of Eurasia. They sought to build a stupa-like structure but were unable to do so in the Egyptian desert. Who knows if they build one in the endlessly changing Nile Valley. What they did do however was impart their knowledge, as well as that of the existing Egyptians, to build casing stones for their pyramids, smoothing them over, as if they were mounds made of soil, which are essentially smooth.

We went from step pyramids.... . 

 

To smooth pyramids with the change of a dynasty. Now I wonder if the bend in the bent pyramid is not deliberate, to simulate an earth mound of Eurasia perhaps? Archaeologists see it as a mistake.. 

I think this may have inspired Biblical stories about Joseph (perhaps one inspiration for  Djozer/Zozer), and subsequently replaced later by Pharaoh, who then oppressed the inhabitants. This reminds one of the oppression spoken of by Herodotus, similar to Fourth Dynasty leaders like Khufu who essentially had a different religion or purpose to the Egyptians. Of course a similar scenario may have happened later on, with New Kingdom usurping Hyksos kingdom, but legends are not history, so any significant historical period could have contributed ideas to later stories

 

Egypt then may well have been a clash of pyramid cultures This clash then inspired the evolution of pyramids, during the third millennium before Christ.

If you would like to read more about some of my ideas regarding all this, please have a look at my book, In Search of the Origin of Pyramids and the Lost Gods of Giza, available cheaply in Kindle edition. It is also available in paperback edition for those who wish to make notes. I guarantee you will see info found no-where else. . . 

.

The Triple god and Giza

The major claim of my book: In Search of the Origin of Pyramids, is that the three pyramids of the Giza plateau probably represent the triple Goddess. The major stumbling block however is trying to work out exactly which Goddess is being represented. What is her overall name? What are the name of the constituent gods or goddesses? We do not know the answer and I suspect the answer was not known even at the time the pyramids were being constructed. In short they were built for flexibility because there were so many varieties of triple goddess out there at the time of building!

In reading a book recently, Astrology in Ancient Mesopotamia, by Michael Beigent, I come across the knowledge that the first deities of the Semites were the Sun (Shamash), Moon (Sin) and Venus,(Ishtar)*, forming a kind of triple deity. These are the known deities at the very beginning of history. (Giza pyramids were built about 500 years (2600BC) after the beginning of history 3100 BC) This is rather insightful. In fact I was not aware of this when I made the suggestion in my book about the nature of the goddess on the Giza plateau or a parallel development in ancient Mexico: the Teotiuacan complex!

Let's have a look.

Moon and Sun

I think the ancient pyramid cult, in whatever culture it found itself, being spread throughout the world long before the fourth millennium BC, but thereafter again and again crossing over, one culture on top of another, was archaeoastronomical in outlook. A pyramid complex is a world center or an archaeoastronomical complex. The most significant astronomical ideas to evoke our wonder in this instance would be the Sun and Moon. The fact they are the same size in the sky would of course make them incredibly interesting not only to us, but also to early astronomers, as if they were two halves of a related god/goddess. It is as if the gods deliberately made the moon, as a mask, to obscure the sun, in order to either scare us, or teach us about astronomy! Occasionally Venus of course pops up next to the Sun or Moon.

Venus

Then we have the smaller component, Venus. This is the fire god, Vulcan as a morning star to the Romans. Venus has such peculiar and rapid behaviour that it was seen as two separate gods. One for morning behaviour and one for evening behaviour. In the evening it sets with Sun, but rises with Sun in the morning.

Giza

Now we are prepared to examine Giza in the context of the triple God. In looking at the structure of the plateau we see two objects of the same size, possibly Moon and Sun, and then a third object, possibly Venus. Again I am assuming flexibility here in the ancient interpretation or building design of this huge mega-monument to the triple goddess. Venus here would be the fire god, the third and smallest pyramid. It is hardly a Venus colour, the Menkaura pyramid was intended to be a pink or red granite, (fire god?) but this was never completed! I think Giza was the final great monument to the Triple deity to be found in the western hemisphere.

 In looking at the Giza complex, we may see three aspects of the triple goddess, moon, sun and Venus. Of course the Egyptians were flexible. There was never just one interpretation of the triple deity! Egypt herself had several, even overlapping interpretations! A sense of this overlap is given by the fact of the existence of three Queens pyramids next to the Mycerinus pyramid, and also three queens pyramids next to the Khufu pyramid, more Triple goddesses! The Khufu pyramid was also intended as a sort of model of Earth, RE the incorporation of Earth's polar radius. I cover related ratios for the Khafre pyramid in my book.

There were many different triple deities during Old Egyptian times.  The Goddess was far far older than Egypt and accords with an ideology and pattern which pre-dates Egypt, a pattern people who have said: 'Giza belongs at the end, not the beginning', have sought for millennia!

Mexico

If we look to the Teotihuacan complex, we see much the same pattern. It tells us that the Giza/Teotihuacan cult are similar not because of trans-Atlantic travel during Egyptian times, as suggested by Heyerdahl, but rather because both are older cults than their surviving components. 

 

 

There are three pyramids at Teotihuacan, Moon, Sun, and Feathered Serpent, possibly a later manifestation of the Fire God Venus? 

In the figure above, we are looking at something quite similar to Giza. Of course this implies that both are relics of a cult which is far older. It also puts the current estimate of the age of Teotihuacan, being the first centuries AD, at far too recent for the actual initial construction of these monuments. Older layers may reveal an earlier dating pattern.

 

If you would like to read more about some of my ideas regarding all this, please have a look at my book, In Search of the Origin of Pyramids and the Lost Gods of Giza, available cheaply in Kindle edition. It is also available in paperback edition for those who wish to make notes. I guarantee you will see info linking Giza with the worldwide pyramid religion, found no-where else.

 

 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* It just occurs to me that the word for moon, Sin, may have been transferred to the word 'Sun' by Phoenecian tin traders, trading with Germans in ancient times. The link is the moon was an early monotheism, transferred to solar monotheism.

Is the Meidum Pyramid, the collapsed tower of Babel? 

This is a rather different article, sourcing information found in Appendix D of my book, In Search of the Origin of Pyramids and the Lost Gods of Giza, available cheaply in Kindle edition. It is also available in paperback edition

Firstly, in Genesis... we appear to see a description of the world-wide pyramid religion

Providing the general outline here, I will add comments to the Bible. I feel that the Babel story as found in Genesis is merely a way of explaining, in ancient times, the prevalence of the pyramid religion around the world. It is perhaps a relic of the trading empires of the Bronze Age, a story which later found its way into the Bible. It seems to be rather different indeed from the collapse story!

1.Now the whole world had one language and a common speech. As people moved eastward, they found a plain in and settled there.

This is possibly a way of explaining to people, in ancient times, why it is that pyramids are found everywhere. Eastward movement, a religion arising out of drowned Doggerland?  

2.They said to each other, “Come, let’s make bricks and bake them thoroughly.” They used brick instead of stone, and tar for mortar.

3 And they said, “Come, let us build ourselves a city, and a tower whose top is in the heavens; let us make a name for ourselves, lest we be scattered abroad over the face of the whole earth.”

This seems to be suggesting that if the people, perhaps semi-nomadic, won't build a tower, they might become scattered. 

4 But the Lord came down to see the city and the tower which the sons of men had built.

The idea of the Lord 'coming down' seems to imply some form of solar worship, the sun striking a certain rock around equinoxes, solstices, etc. In fact, Robert Temple has recently found the Giza complex to be highly archaeo-astronomical. 

5 And the Lord said, “Indeed the people are one and they all have one language, and this is what they begin to do; now nothing that they propose to do will be withheld from them.

6 Come, let Us go down and there confuse their language, that they may not understand one another’s speech.”

7 So the Lord scattered them abroad from there over the face of all the earth, and they ceased building the city.

This seems to be a retelling of section 1.), a kind of circularity of logic. The people were initially prevalent everywhere, yet were scattered because of their arrogance, but this time their languages became unclear to one another. Perhaps the unknown trading empire had collapsed. 

8 Therefore its name is called Babel, because there the Lord confused the language of all the earth; and from there the Lord scattered them abroad over the face of all the earth.

— Genesis 11:4–9

Nothing is mentioned of any collapse here. Merely that people began to build a tower in one place, and then this people were scattered across the earth.

The collapse

Information  about the supposed collapse of the tower of Babel may have pertained to the collapse of some other structure, subsequently associated with the tower of Babel. The text of Jubilees, like every Biblical work, is very fascinating. It reads like a historical chronicle! Considered canonical to the Ethiopian church it is not canonical to other churches. It is also known as the Lesser Genesis.

1. (18) And in the three and thirtieth jubilee, in the first year in the second week, Peleg took to himself a wife, whose name was Lomna the daughter of Sina'ar, and she bare him a son in the fourth year of this week, and he called his name Reu; for he said: 'Behold the children of men have become evil through the wicked purpose of building for themselves a city and a tower in the land of Shinar.' 
2. For they departed from the land of Ararat eastward to Shinar; for in his days they built the city and the tower, saying, 'Go to, let us ascend thereby into heaven.' 

Ararat being Urartu, a land of the north. Shinar being Sumer. This implies the pyramid religion was thought to have come down out of the north. Urartu also has mountains. Did they miss mountains enough to build an artificial one?

1. And they began to build, and in the fourth week they made brick with fire, and the bricks served them for stone, and the clay with which they cemented them together was asphalt which comes out of the sea, and out of the fountains of water in the land of Shinar.
2. And they built it: forty and three years [1645-1688 A.M.] were they building it; its breadth was 203 bricks, and the height (of a brick) was the third of one; its height amounted to 5433 cubits and 2 palms, and (the extent of one wall was) thirteen stades (and of the other thirty stades). 

2.4 km tall according to the google version of what a cubit was. The real answer may elude us. This also seems to preserve the memory of something having taken 43 years to build. I suppose we shall never know what that was.

1. And the Lord our God said unto us: Behold, they are one people, and (this) they begin to do, and now nothing will be withholden from them. Go to, let us go down and confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech, and they may be dispersed into cities and nations, and one purpose will no longer abide with them till the day of judgment.'
2. And the Lord descended, and we descended with him to see the city and the tower which the children of men had built.
3. And he confounded their language, and they no longer understood one another's speech, and they ceased then to build the city and the tower.
4. For this reason the whole land of Shinar is called Babel, because the Lord did there confound all the language of the children of men, and from thence they were dispersed into their cities, each according to his language and his nation.
5. And the Lord sent a mighty wind against the tower and overthrew it upon the earth, and behold it was between Asshur and Babylon in the land of Shinar, and they called its name 'Overthrow'.
6. In the fourth week in the first year [1688 A.M.] in the beginning thereof in the four and thirtieth jubilee, were they dispersed from the land of Shinar.
7. (28)And Ham and his sons went into the land which he was to occupy, which he acquired as his portion in the land of the south.

 Jubilees 10:18-28

Ham, or the Hamites, then supposedly took Africa, The Egyptian speech being Hamitic. Ignoring the geography for one moment, since legends tend to be all over the place, sourcing their ideas from everywhere, down the generations, we may look to a rather famous pyramid collapse, so famous that it altered the slope of the subsequent 'bent' pyramid from pi/4 to pi/3. 

 

 The Bent Pyramid, supposedly built after the Meidum pyramid

In the early 20th century, Egyptologists said the Bent Pyramid was altered in slope during its building work due to the fact that the perhaps wanted to save on building materials. Mendelssohn pointed out, as did perhaps several before him, that the collapse of the Meidum pyramid may have spurned the change in angle of the Meidum pyramid.

Tower of Babel?

The tower of Babel legend is segmented into various areas. In terms of notions found in the earlier book of Genesis, people literally, supposedly had to build a tower, to avoid being scattered. It is almost as if this was part of their religion and more than one tower of babel was built. Pyramid building essentially seems to have been a sort of fertility religion. Build pyramids, as a kind of artificial mountain, crops grow in its shadow. If not, the tribe must move on to more fertile regions.

This is the remnant of the Meidum Pyramid. It is a sort of inner core. The supposed collapsed casing and other parts of the pyramid are found around it (according to another theory, the 'collapsed' part is actually the ramp of an unfinished pyramid!)

Legends come in all forms. Genesis supposedly retains material, ideas brought from Sumer, yet much later prophet Moses lived in Egypt. It was his home. Egypt cannot be divorced from the Biblical story. Is this then the pyramid or tower associated with the book of Jubilees? The collapse may have had a momentous impact upon Egyptian culture as well as pyramid design. Yet.... didn't find its way into the Bible! Or did it?

Bibliography:

Charles Kos, In Search of the Origin of Pyramids, Plus Ultra Books, 2015
Kurt Mendelssohn, Riddle of the Pyramids, Norton, 1986.


If you would like to read more about some of my ideas regarding all this, please have a look at my book, In Search of the Origin of Pyramids and the Lost Gods of Giza, available cheaply in Kindle edition. It is also available in paperback edition for those who wish to make notes. I guarantee you will see info found no-where else.