Vitrified Glaze and MELT on SACSAYHUAMAN and nearby peaks!

Why is Sacsayhuaman all melted away? What's going on? 

I have been reading some Eric Von Daniken lately.... in two books, Return to the Stars and also Pathways to the Gods, he mentions that the fortress above the famous walls of Sacsayhuaman are more interesting than what the tourists are looking at... the huge stones... because it's all melted up there! 



The tops of Sacsayhuaman and nearby peaks have this vitrified 'sheen' to them, which is rather difficult to explain. Parts of the top of the fortress are completely melted. 

1) If it was lightning which caused the meltage, why was this not attracted to the higher peaks nearby? What's going on? 


2) Was it ancient thermonuclear weapons? If so it was the last gasp of an attack because Sacsayhuaman, though built well, is not built on some modern highly-geometric design, more like by some vestige of a former high civilisation which retained their geopolymer knowledge, but little else. They built this high fortress in the hills to escape from the savage unfriendly tribes below. Yet the walls are strong enough to deflect artillery. Could they have been vitrified by remnant nuclear weapons from suborbital platforms on 'autofire?' 

We look at the nearby peak which is called 'The Throne of the Incas', in this it appears the glaze or vitrification is confined largely to the worked areas, which means it could be a feature of the workmanship. It is actually hard to find pictures of the melted areas as these are simply ignored by tourists in favour of the better less damaged areas... i'd rather not directly use pictures from any book, prefer pictures already online. 

'Cut like Butter'.... MOULDS were pressed in and geopolymer scooped out

Not a regular quarry... 

Not a quarry... moulds were pressed into this pre-Inca site and geo-polymer scooped out. 

After all this, we must ask why the sites were abandoned. Was it superweapons of some kind, which basically cooked the sites into what geologists now term 'metamorphic' rock? 

Weapons like the Pushpaka Vimana are described hurling nuclear-type missiles. A vimana is an artificially-built craft, not a description of a comet or other natural event. 

Moulding could be the way that such things are done... 

How did people even come up with the geopolymer in the first place? I believe this is further proof that the technology is one hundred thousand years old, just as today geopolymer is discovered and described thanks to the use of computer technologies...

Final Proof of POURED "QUARTZ STONE" 1350 B.C. This will shock you...

Poured Stone

Builder's Inscription: "It was like baking bread!" This is really weird! It would seem that Egyptians were able to pour hard rocks, just as in South America! So it isn't just the pyramids which were possibly geopolymer.

This theory comes from Joseph Davidovits. I looked at the Collossi of Memnon just lately and realised... 'wow!' those lumps on the chest are a dry mixture! The chest of the non-ruined colossi is proof of geopolymer in all its obvious glory!

The right-most collossi must have had an even more ruined body, yet it is claimed that it 'fell down in an earthquake'. Excuse me but there is no way an earthquake is going to topple that!

Wikipedia is just wrong. These statues are 60ft high, imagine how much they weigh. There is no way the Egyptians carried them 700km as is claimed. Rather it is geopolymer, and in fact this is just what is claimed.

In fact we have a description actually belonging to the creator of the statue. He states that the statues were sculpted rather quickly and in a mould. He claims to have developed a sort of technology similar to baking bread. Have a read in the link below. It's obvious that so many words are just untranslatable. Although the builder makes a lot of big claims about having invented the geopolymer process, I think he simply read some old books from the Old Kingdom.

IDENTITY OF SPHINX DISCOVERED? Khufu's infamous Playgirl Daughter?!

Identity of Sphinx discovered? 

Riddle of the Sphinx. After much pondering... is this Playgirl-Princess Nefertiabet, ("beautiful one of the east"... sphinx faces east) daughter of Khufu? The ears seem to match. In addition although we only have one picture of Nefertiabet, the profile, we see that the jaw of her father matches the Sphinx' face' jaw, though the sphinx be not he! 

Let us look at the evidence. According to Herodotus' legend, Khufu hated the Egyptian gods and closed down all the temples. This gave him one motive to destroy the image of the Anubis-sphinx and convert it. Motive number two would be to replace the face with that of his daughter. 

He was after all in charge of Giza for quite a long time and revamped the entire site as his life's work. According to the Inventory Stela, a temple existed before Khufu, which he 'repaired.' According to the Stela, and this may become the topic for a new video: "After this, the inscription claims that the Isis temple was already at its place before the pyramids had been erected and that the temple was discovered by Khufu east of the great pyramid at the "house of Harmakhis" (i.e. the Sphinx temple). Then it claims that Khufu first "built the temple of Isis anew" and then built a pyramid for the "king's daughter Henutsen". Finally, the goddess Isis is praised and again entitled as "mistress of the pyramids." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invento... A note that Henutsen was khufu's wife according to another interpretation. 

Building the Temple of Isis anew... would this not imply that this was the re-carving of the sphinx in the face of a beautiful woman... his daughter perhaps? Is this in fact where her infamous reputation as a prostitute derives? Isis is praised as mistress of the pyramids... how about Nefertiabet? 

According to Herodotus, the daughter of Khufu was pressed into becoming a prostitute by Khufu to pay for the pyramid. This sounds like a bunch of garbage that the lowest of the low would pass around, jealous words regarding his daughter's important role in the Giza complex. According to another legend, she was actively involved at Giza and what must have started as a bad joke, that she charged her clients a block of stone each, was finally passed down to Herodotus! 

This to me sounds like it was inspired by the mad jealousy of others seeing her visage... carved into the sphinx! Is this how Khufu renewed the temple? 

We also discuss a few others. It isn't Hatshepsut. It isn't Hetepheres, also of the 4th dynasty. It isn't Nofret. It isn't Sobeknefru, who had incredibly beauty. Nor is it any of the Cleopatras who did not really possess any likeness. The huge eyes remind me of Ptolemy X who did in fact mess with ancient artefacts, paying his mercenaries with gold from Alexander's melted sarcophagus, a move which got him deposed. The eyes and nose of the sphinx are heavily damaged to deface the monument of someone who would have been living. 

Picture reveals TRUTH! Normans rebuilt part of ROMAN Tower OF LONDON, ca...

Real history of the Tower of London?

It is really interesting what happened here. Let me paraphrase... At least one of the back towers was added in later times. The Normans repaired and added to a heavily damaged Roman Tower which was built between 250AD and about 300AD, reflecting its late Roman design. 


Look at this quote I just found in Gildas, regarding towers built in Southern England! I am unsure if it actually relates to the Roman Tower of London... but it would seem that preventing ships sailing up the Thames would resist a Barbarian attack! 

"18... The Romans, therefore, left the country, giving notice that they could no longer be harassed by such laborious expeditions, nor suffer the Roman standards, with so large and brave an army, to be worn out by sea and land by fighting against these un-warlike, plundering vagabonds; but that the islanders, inuring themselves to warlike weapons, and bravely fighting, should valiantly protect their country, their property, wives and children, and, what is dearer than these, their liberty and lives; that they should not suffer their hands to be tied behind their backs by a nation which, unless they were enervated by idleness and sloth, was not more powerful than themselves, but that they should arm those hands with buckler, sword, and spear, ready for the field of battle; and, because they thought this also of advantage to the people they were about to leave, they, with the help of the miserable natives, built a wall different from the former, by public and private contributions, and of the same structure as walls generally, extending in a straight line from sea to sea, between some cities, which, from fear of their enemies, had there by chance been built. They then give energetic counsel to the timorous natives, and leave them patterns by which to manufacture arms. Moreover, on the south coast where their vessels lay, as there was some apprehension lest the barbarians might land, they erected towers at stated intervals, commanding a prospect of the sea; and then left the island never to return."
http://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/1...

This sounds a lot like Rome in the time of Aetius, in the 450s. Rome had lost Africa to the Vandals a generation or so earlier and was struggling to maintain the remainder against a horde of barbarians with a much reduced income (only 40,000 pounds of gold per annum), which could only maintain an army at maximum of 30,000 soldiers, far too small. Even so 2/3 of its annual income was required for this! 
By this stage, the Roman emperor only wished to reside in Ravenna, not liking the squalor of Rome. I believe the tower possibly went up in the late 200s or the 300s, at about the same time the walls around Chichester. Any later and the Romano-British would have had to have built it for themselves and I am unsure if the economy would have been powerful enough for such an endeavour. 

In addition there was a building there called the Arx Palatina. (Palatine Fortress). There was another Arx Palatina on the other side of Londonium on the river bank, where Blackfriars now is. I believe this was converted into Blackfriars Monastery but I would have to look into this further. 

OOPS! "Tower of London" REALLY built in 300 AD, then CATASTROPHE, 'fixed...

If this was built by the Normans, why is the Tower of London actually on a Roman Medallion? 

What's the "Viracocha Sun-gate-God" doing in the English Landscape? Is h...

Viracocha Sun God, identified as Apollo!? 

This is just plain weird!